highly significantp < 0.001
This gender difference was highly significant ( χ 2 = 98.961, p < 0.001, Cramer's V = 0.643), indicating a strong effect size ( Figure 2A ).
This gender difference was highly significant ( χ 2 = 98.961, p < 0.001, Cramer's V = 0.643), indicating a strong effect size ( Figure 2A ).
Risk perception showed a negative trend in its association with support among nurses.
Although the pattern of risk perception appeared to differ between professional groups, the interaction between professional identity and risk perception did not reach statistical significance and should therefore be interpreted as exploratory.