highly significantp = 0.002
Analysis of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) adherence revealed highly significant differences between the two approaches (standardized difference 1.40, 95% CI: 0.64, 2.15; p = 0.002; adjusted p < 0.001).
Analysis of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) adherence revealed highly significant differences between the two approaches (standardized difference 1.40, 95% CI: 0.64, 2.15; p = 0.002; adjusted p < 0.001).
Intraoperative bleeding showed a trend toward lower volumes in the WeChat remote platform group (7.61 ± 3.86 vs. 6.88 ± 3.63 ml, p = 0.149, adjusted p = 0.085), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (Table 1 ).
6.88 ± 3.63 ml, p = 0.149, adjusted p = 0.085), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (Table 1 ).
While not statistically definitive, such marginally non-significant findings with moderate effect sizes warrant consideration in the context of digital health interventions targeting chronic conditions (Table 4 ).