showed a trendP =0.054
For recurrent ischemic stroke, combination therapy showed a trend towards a higher risk compared to OAC monotherapy (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.00– 1.26]; P =0.054) with moderate heterogeneity observed (I 2 =71.1%) ( Figure 3A ).
For recurrent ischemic stroke, combination therapy showed a trend towards a higher risk compared to OAC monotherapy (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.00– 1.26]; P =0.054) with moderate heterogeneity observed (I 2 =71.1%) ( Figure 3A ).
For short-term outcomes, the direction of effect for recurrent ischemic stroke was consistent with the primary Peto analysis, favoring combination therapy, but did not reach statistical significance (OR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.13–1.07]; P =0.067; I 2 =0.0%).
[ 10 ] observed events, revealing a nonsignificant trend favoring combination therapy (OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.15–1.30]; P =0.136).