showed a trendp = 0.265
The TIM‐3 positive group showed a trend toward poorer outcomes in terms of DSS ( p = 0.265), DFS ( p = 0.168), and RFS ( p = 0.059), without statistical significance (Figure 4 ).
The TIM‐3 positive group showed a trend toward poorer outcomes in terms of DSS ( p = 0.265), DFS ( p = 0.168), and RFS ( p = 0.059), without statistical significance (Figure 4 ).
While the LAG‐3 positive group did show a trend toward worse outcomes in terms of DSS ( p = 0.098) and DFS ( p = 0.101), this difference did not reach statistical significance (Figure 5 ).