21.8%, with unadjusted HR 0.547 (95% CI 0.308–0.972, P = 0.041) and adjusted HR 0.703 (95% CI 0.491–1.007, P = 0.055); effects again favored RIPC with borderline significance in the adjusted model.
← all excerpts
Remote ischemic preconditioning in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction and transient ischemic attack: a retrospective cohort study.
3
—
—
The sentences
40.0%, with unadjusted HR 0.628 (95% CI 0.402–0.981, P = 0.043) and adjusted HR 0.715 (95% CI 0.506–1.011, P = 0.059), showing a directionally similar benefit that approached significance after adjustment.
9.1%)—though individual components did not reach statistical significance.