highly significantp < .001
The experimental group’s breadth gain (M = 13.4 points) was roughly twice that of the control group (M = 6.3 points), and the between-group difference on gain scores was highly significant (t = 4.37, p < .001).
The experimental group’s breadth gain (M = 13.4 points) was roughly twice that of the control group (M = 6.3 points), and the between-group difference on gain scores was highly significant (t = 4.37, p < .001).
Self-efficacy, dominant in the breadth model, fell short of significance for depth (β = 0.18, p = .062).
The anxiety–evaluation link did not reach statistical significance ( r = − .17, p = .063).
Anxiety approached significance (β = − 0.15, p = .078) but did not cross the threshold.