showed a trendp = 0.09
In this subgroup analysis of IVIg‐naïve patients, the difference in lesion area showed a trend (5.0 ± 4.0 vs. 1.1 ± 0.27 cm 2 , p = 0.09).
In this subgroup analysis of IVIg‐naïve patients, the difference in lesion area showed a trend (5.0 ± 4.0 vs. 1.1 ± 0.27 cm 2 , p = 0.09).
This result may reflect a true effect that failed to reach statistical significance owing to the limited sample size and insufficient statistical power.