Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparative efficacy of double and triple arthrodesis in adult-acquired flatfoot deformity: a retrospective analysis.

BMC Surg · 2026 · PMC13330461 · PMID 42393669

2
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

nominally significantno p-value reported
Moreover, when the difference in PTI (healthy side minus affected side) for each plantar region was calculated and compared between the two groups, nominally significant differences were observed for the lateral sole (mean difference: 1.16 N·s/cm2, 95% CI: 0.08 to 2.24, Cohen’s d = 0.958) and entire sole (mean difference: 0.53 N·s/cm2, 95% CI: -0.11 to 1.17, Cohen’s d = 0.718) before correction for multiple comparisons ( P = 0.037 and P = 0.048, respectively; Table 5 ; Fig. 5 ).

also in 7,732 other papers

Notably, compared with the double arthrodesis group, the triple arthrodesis required a significantly longer average operative time and showed a tendency toward a longer period to achieve complete fusion, although the latter difference did not reach statistical significance (Table 2 ).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.