Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Geographic variation and localised clustering of congenital anomalies in Great Britain.

Emerg Themes Epidemiol · 2007 · PMC1939702 · PMID 17617898

4
hedged sentences
0.0500
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.0970
boldest claim

The sentences

nominally significantp < 0.05actually significant
Two subtypes showed nominally significant (p < 0.05) heterogeneity over EDs after full adjustment: neural tube defects and specifically spina bifida.

also in 7,732 other papers

approached significancep = 0.097so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
For example the 5 th –95 th RR range estimated between registers for limb reduction was just 0.76–1.27, but this approached significance at p = 0.097.

also in 8,237 other papers

borderline significantno p-value reported
The borderline significant gastroschisis finding is of interest given the increasing trends in prevalence over the last few decades reported elsewhere and rather strong regional differences in prevalence [ 17 - 22 ].

also in 11,409 other papers

highly significantno p-value reported
There was highly significant heterogeneity of all non-chromosomal anomalies across districts and across hospital catchment areas.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.