Role of the human supplementary eye field in the control of saccadic eye movements.

Neuropsychologia · 2007 · PMC2649282 · PMID 17069864

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.1000

boldest claim

The sentences

a strong trendp < 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

20) larger than for controls, which was significantly different from chance in three task conditions (single gap: t (6) = 2.5, p < 0.05, mixed gap: t (6) = 4.02, p < 0.01, mixed no-gap: t (6) = 6.07, p < 0.001) and showed a strong trend towards significance in the fourth (single no-gap: t (6) = 2.37, p < 0.06).

also in 5,725 other papers

a trend towards significancep < 0.1so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In fact, on the anti-saccade task, he was actually better than controls, making far fewer errors (significant in the no-gap condition ( t (6) = 2.44, p < 0.05) and showing a trend towards significance in the gap condition ( t (6) = 2.27, p < 0.1).

also in 2,760 other papers

showed a trendp < 0.1so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Similarly, in blocks where the two tasks were mixed he showed a trend towards making fewer errors than controls in the anti-saccade task (mixed gap: t (6) = 2.1, p < 0.1, mixed no-gap: t (6) = 2.42, p < 0.1).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.