Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Genotype and gene expression associations with immune function in Drosophila.

PLoS Genet · 2010 · PMC2793509 · PMID 20066029

4
hedged sentences
0.0000
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0377
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP <2.2×10 -16actually significant
Likelihood ratio tests reveal a large, highly significant effect of third chromosome line on phenotypic variation in bacterial load against all four bacteria ( S. marcescens : χ 2 = 128.42, d.f. = 1, P <2.2×10 -16 ; P. rettgeri : χ 2 = 263.88, d.f. = 1, P <2.2×10 −16 ; E. faecalis : χ 2 = 51.533, d.f. = 1, P = 7.04×10 −13 ; L. lactis : χ 2 = 35.391, d.f. = 1, P = 2.70×10 −9 ).

also in 132,142 other papers

weakly significantP = 0.0377actually significant
While 6.93% of tests are significant at a nominal α of 0.05, a weakly significant excess over the null expectation (χ 2 = 4.32, d. f. = 1, P = 0.0377), only 0.91% of tests are significant at a nominal α of 0.01, which is not different from the null expectation (χ 2 = 0.042, d. f. = 1, P = 0.8367).

also in 1,387 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported
In this case, genotypes at two out of 10 SNPs are associated with variation in bacterial load against at least two different bacteria at a nominal α of 0.05, and a third marker has marginal significance.

also in 5,069 other papers

nominally significantno p-value reported
Nominally significant associations are also not evenly distributed within functional classes of the immune system.

also in 7,732 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.