Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Peri-operative chemotherapy for the treatment of resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BMC Cancer · 2010 · PMC2908098 · PMID 20565923

2
hedged sentences
0.3500
closest p · 7.0× alpha
0.3500
boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp = 0.35not close (p > 0.1)
Considering only the three trials of higher quality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96) [ 11 , 15 , 20 ], the results did not differ significantly compared to all eight trials (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88) Despite a suboptimal regime which was standard at the time recruitment started, the two randomized trials investigating the effect of systemic adjuvant therapy with 5 FU/FA showed a trend towards a better RFS in one study (39 months vs. 20 months; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.46-1.32; p = 0.35) [ 17 ], and a significant improvement in RFS in the other trial (24.4 months vs. 17.6 months; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96; p = 0.028) [ 20 ].

also in 53,322 other papers

of marginal significanceno p-value reported
The result for recurrence-free survival (RFS) was only of marginal significance and may have been due, in part, to the fact that both trials used an outdated chemotherapy regimen and had to be closed prematurely because of slow accrual [ 14 ].

also in 464 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.