nearly significantp = .054
A t –test revealed a nearly significant difference between the saccadic undershoot to the mid–position of the spatial extended comparison stimulus and to the less extended probe, t (21) = 2.04, p = .054 (cf.
A t –test revealed a nearly significant difference between the saccadic undershoot to the mid–position of the spatial extended comparison stimulus and to the less extended probe, t (21) = 2.04, p = .054 (cf.
However, since the difference between probe and comparison stimulus is only marginally significant in the saccadic behaviour, this conclusion needs further evidence from subsequent experiments.