Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform · 2007 · PMC3073012 · PMID 17683237

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0710

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0710

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = .071so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The main effect of dot motion approached significance, F (1, 9) = 4.18, p = .071, with a trend toward higher standard deviations of error plane position for the biological stimuli ( M = 8.44, SE = 0.45) than for nonbiological stimuli ( M = 7.47, SE = 0.63).

also in 8,237 other papers

highly significantno p-value reported

However, in the current experiment, the movement direction effect was not significant in the second session for testing the effect of dot motion trajectories, whereas the main interference effect remained highly significant.

also in 132,142 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported

The three-way interaction showed a trend for the interference effect (incongruent trial standard deviation minus congruent trial standard deviation) to be stronger for biological than nonbiological dot motion for the vertical performed movement only, t (9) = 2.87, p = .018 (corrected α = .0125 for four tests; other comparisons, t [9] < 1.15, p > .281).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.