Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: repetition effects for pictures versus real objects.

Sci Rep · 2011 · PMC3216611 · PMID 22355647

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.3920

boldest claim

The sentences

a trend toward significancep = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Finally, a paired-samples t-test contrasting the AIs for 2D versus 3D stimuli in each ROI revealed a trend toward significance between the AIs for 2D versus 3D stimuli in LO (t(12) = 2.04, p = 0.06), but no significant differences between AIs in pFS (t(12) = 0.05, p = 0.29).

also in 2,361 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.392not close (p > 0.1)

Planned comparisons confirmed that for 3D objects, repetition effects did not reach statistical significance in LO (t(12) = 0.88, p = 0.392).

also in 61,332 other papers

a clear trendno p-value reported

In pFS, repetition effects also did not reach statistical significance (t(12) = 1.99, p = 0.057), although there was a clear trend in this direction in this more anterior sub-portion of the LO complex.

also in 11,406 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.