highly significantP = 0.005
There was also a marked improvement in the subscale Daytime Dysfunction in the whole sample, where the main effect of Session was highly significant ( F (1, 30) = 9.19, P = 0.005).
There was also a marked improvement in the subscale Daytime Dysfunction in the whole sample, where the main effect of Session was highly significant ( F (1, 30) = 9.19, P = 0.005).
Paired t -tests indicated significant effects for the Mindfulness ( t (1, 11) = −2.688, P = 0.028) and Iyengar ( t (1, 8) = −2.688, P = 0.028) groups and an effect approaching significance in the BWV group ( t (1, 11) = −2.082, P = 0.062).
Separate paired t -tests indicated that this increase approached significance in both the BWV ( t (1, 11) = −1.985, P = 0.078, mean increase: 15.3% (SD: 26.6%)) and Mindfulness ( t (1, 11) = −2.018, P = 0.069, mean increase: 14.5% (SD: 28.7%)) groups, but not in the Iyengar group ( t (1, 8) = −0.989, ns, mean increase: 9.4% (SD: 29.6%)).