Better than I thought: positive evaluation bias in hypomania.

PLoS One · 2012 · PMC3474792 · PMID 23082210

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0650

closest p · 1.3× alpha

0.1270

boldest claim

The sentences

approaching significancep = .065so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A block-group interaction [ F(6,120) = 3.23, p = .006] and a block-cue-group interaction [ F(6,120) = 2.58, p = .022] also emerged, with a main effect of group approaching significance [ F(2,40) = 2.59, p = .065].

also in 2,640 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = .081so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Whilst a valence effect was significant in the Mid-hyp and Hi-hyp groups (p≤.001), a trend for reduction in this effect in the Lo-hyp group ( Figure 3b ) did not reach statistical significance in the Lo-hyp group (p = .081).

also in 111,027 other papers

failed to reach significancep ≥.127not close (p > 0.1)

A cue-group interaction failed to reach significance for blocks 2–4 ( p ≥.127), however, nor were the effect of group or remaining group interactions significant for these blocks ( p ≥.095), indicating that all groups reached the same levels of performance after block 1.

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.