nominally significantP = 0.022
reported nominally significant associations between rs667282 and CPD in a study of 3 725 smokers in a Chinese population ( P = 0.022) [14] .
reported nominally significant associations between rs667282 and CPD in a study of 3 725 smokers in a Chinese population ( P = 0.022) [14] .
However, this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.135 and 0.233, respectively).