Aim 2: Effect of feeding regime on male development and morphology There was a significant difference between the H and L treatments in fixed male size, body condition and wing size, and the difference in development time and antennal length approached significance (see Table 1 ).
← all excerpts
You are what you eat: food limitation affects reproductive fitness in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantid.
2
—
—
The sentences
In this study, there was a significant trend/difference in development and morphology for males and females as a result of juvenile feeding treatment, however, its effect on the fitness components measured for males was much greater than on those measured for females.