You do the math: coding of bets and outcomes in a gambling task in the feedback-related negativity and p300 in healthy adults.

PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3839888 · PMID 24282577

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.3030

closest p · 6.1× alpha

0.4490

boldest claim

The sentences

failed to reach significancep = .303not close (p > 0.1)

The comparison between clear losses – clear wins and clear losses – ambivalent wins failed to reach significance ( p = .303).

also in 4,113 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = .418not close (p > 0.1)

Again, the bet x outcome interaction did not reach statistical significance ( F [2,54] = 0.886, p = .418).

also in 111,027 other papers

failed to reach statistical significancep = .449not close (p > 0.1)

The bet x outcome interaction failed to reach statistical significance ( F [2,54] = 0.775, p = .449).

also in 6,035 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.