Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Perioperative therapy for locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer: current controversies and consensus of care.

J Hematol Oncol · 2013 · PMC3844370 · PMID 24010946

3
hedged sentences
0.0020
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.2300
boldest claim

The sentences

a significant trendp = 0.002actually significant
There was a significant trend to having fewer patients in the advanced T-stage (p = 0.002) and N + groups (p = 0.01) within the perioperative chemotherapy group, despite randomization.

also in 9,775 other papers

a nonsignificant trendp = 0.23not close (p > 0.1)
Recently, the final results were reported, where the primary endpoint of DFS revealed that UFT was inferior to S-1 (HR 1.23, 1.07-1.43), and that there was a nonsignificant trend (HR 0.92, 0.8-1.07; p = 0.23) to improved DFS with sequential PTX→FP versus FP alone [ 45 ].

also in 5,406 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported
The trial showed a trend towards improvement in 3 year OS with induction chemotherapy followed by CRT (47 vs. 28%, respectively) but it was not statistically significant (HR 0.67, CI 0.41-1.07, p = 0.07).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.