Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Task-specific and general cognitive effects in Chiari malformation type I.

PLoS One · 2014 · PMC3988081 · PMID 24736676

3
hedged sentences
0.0700
closest p · 1.4× alpha
0.0700
boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The main effect of group approached significance, F(1, 46) = 3.46, p = .07, η P 2 = .07 (words recalled: CM group = 6.00, Control group = 7.04, and there was a main effect of retention interval, F(1, 46) = 67.26, p<.0001, η P 2 = .60 (immediate recall = 7.44 words, delayed recall = 5.60 words), but group did not interact with retention interval (p = .71) (see Figure 2 ).

also in 8,237 other papers

Results The CM group showed performance decrements relative to the controls in response inhibition (Stroop interference), working memory computational speed (Ospan), and processing speed (automated digit symbol substitution task), but group differences in recall did not reach statistical significance.

also in 111,027 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported
This suggests that the marginally significant group effects in recall were associated with a variable related to anxiety and depression—likely chronic pain.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.