a significant trendp = 0.07
Finally, we also found a significant trend in the interaction effect [ F (2, 36) = 2.9, p = 0.07], due to the fact that bvFTD patients tended to make no less risky choices in gains than in losses ( M = 6.43 vs.
Finally, we also found a significant trend in the interaction effect [ F (2, 36) = 2.9, p = 0.07], due to the fact that bvFTD patients tended to make no less risky choices in gains than in losses ( M = 6.43 vs.
bvFTD patients made mostly maximizing choices ( M = 0.61), and though they tended to make less than control participants ( M = 0.74) and AD patients ( M = 0.81), this difference did not reach statistical significance.