Intravenous versus intra-arterial thrombolysis in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One · 2015 · PMC4287629 · PMID 25569136

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0300

closest p · 0.6× alpha

0.6700

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendP = 0.03actually significant

In a randomized controlled study (N = 7) that compared IAT to IVT with recombinant tPA for treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke with major vessel inclusion, Sen et al (2009) also found that IAT showed a trend toward a higher recanalization rate (3/3 patients for IAT and 0/4 patients for IVT; P = 0.03) ( Table 2 ) [ 20 ].

also in 53,322 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.67not close (p > 0.1)

8/29), the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR, 3.2; 95%CI, 0.9 to 11.4; P = 0.67).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.