approached significancep = .051
However, the cumulative drop in the controls’ retention over the 30-min to 8-hr interval approached significance, t (15) = 2.121, p = .051, r = .48.
However, the cumulative drop in the controls’ retention over the 30-min to 8-hr interval approached significance, t (15) = 2.121, p = .051, r = .48.
Whereas the former group difference was nonsignificant, t (14.287) = 1.647, p = .121, r = .40, the latter was near-significant, t (25) = 2.006, p = .056, r = .37.
Moreover, inclusion of the NART-predicted verbal IQ as a covariate in the analysis had minimal effect on our main findings: The percentage retention scores remained significantly different between the TEA patients and the controls after 8 hr, 24 hr and 1 week, and the group difference was close to significance after 3 hr: 30 min, F (1, 24) = 0.530, p = .473, η p 2 = .022; 3 hr, F (1, 24) = 3.997, p = .057, η p 2 = .143; 8 hr, F (1, 24) = 19.279, p < .001, η p 2 = .445; 24 hr, F (1, 24) = 10.043, p < .01, η p 2 = .295; 1 week, F (1, 24) = 30.718, p < .001, η p 2 = .561.