Comparison of semi-automated methods to quantify infarct size and area at risk by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths.

All other methods demonstrated moderate inverse correlation and did not reach statistical significance.

also in 111,027 other papers

The reduction in quantification time with FWHM was highly significant when compared with manual quantification at both field strengths, and when compared with 5SD and 8SD at 1.5T.

also in 132,142 other papers

There was a strong trend towards reduced IS quantification time using FWHM compared with all SD-based methods at both field strengths.

also in 5,725 other papers