a clear trendP = 0.0222
This decrease was significant in SAMR1, whereas SAMP8 showed a clear trend with mean values similar to SAMR1 astrocytes (ANOVA indicated an effect of CR treatment, F 1,23 = 6.009, P = 0.0222).
This decrease was significant in SAMR1, whereas SAMP8 showed a clear trend with mean values similar to SAMR1 astrocytes (ANOVA indicated an effect of CR treatment, F 1,23 = 6.009, P = 0.0222).
Levels of the mitochondrial antioxidant enzyme aconitase 2 showed a trend to decrease in SAMP8 astrocytes and a significant increase after CR treatment (Fig. 3E ) (ANOVA indicated an interaction of strain x treatment, F 1,22 = 5.975, P = 0.230).