Computerized Analysis of Verbal Fluency: Normative Data and the Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury.

PLoS One · 2016 · PMC5147824 · PMID 27936001

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0030

closest p · 0.1× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep < 0.003actually significant

In the phonemic condition, the independent contribution of Education only approached significance, while the influence of Computer-use persisted [t(176) = 3.04, p < 0.003].

also in 8,237 other papers

showed a trendp < 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Typicality showed a trend towards an increase versus Experiment 1 [F(1,218) = 3.48, p < 0.07], and was significantly increased relative to Experiment 2a [F(1,39) = 17.22, p < 0.0002, partial ω 2 = 0.29].

also in 53,322 other papers

highly significantno p-value reported

In addition, ESA-defined semantic switches showed an ICC of 0.62 over different categories, while the number of multi-word clusters (ICC = 0.47) showed lower, but still highly significant, reliability.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.