The Interactive Influence of Perceived Ownership and Perceived Choosership of Stocks on Brain Response to Stock Outcomes.

Front Psychol · 2017 · PMC5278520 · PMID 28194118

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = 0.001actually significant

Additionally, a two-way interaction between ownership and valence (stock outcome) approached significance, F (1, 21) = 13.68, p = 0.001, η 2 partial = 0.394, suggesting that the gain–loss effect was inconsistent between the two different owners (self, other).

also in 8,237 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In terms of the d-FRN's statistical analysis from the other-chosen stocks, a 2 (stock owner: self, other) × 10 (electrode: F3, F4, FC1, FC2, Fz, Cz, C3, C4, CP1, and CP2) ANOVA produced a marginally significant main effect of ownership, F (1, 21) = 3.65, p = 0.07, η 2 partial = 0.148.

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

The interaction between ownership and the electrode did not reach statistical significance, F (1, 21) < 1.00 (see Figures 6 , 7 ).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.