The change in EEM area for each 1 mm 2 change in plaque area (i.e., the slope of the regression line) was greater for fibrous plaques compared to non-fibrous plaques but did not reach statistical significance (slopes = 1.48 vs. 1.04 mm 2 , p = 0.061; Figure 1A ).
← all excerpts
Relation between baseline plaque features and subsequent coronary artery remodeling determined by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
2
0.0610
0.1180
The sentences
Compared with non-attenuated plaques, the regression line for attenuated plaques was flatter but the difference failed to reach statistical significance ( p = 0.118; Figure 2A ).