highly significantp < 0.001
Post-hoc analysis conducted for each group showed that for the NT group, there was a highly significant effect of Condition with a large effect size (lateral: t (16) = 5.138, p < 0.001, d = 1.388; midline: t (16) = 4.567, p < 0.001, d = 1.34), while for the ASD group, the effect of Condition was not significant and the effect size was small (lateral: t (10) = 0.626, p = 0.545, d = 0.259; midline: t (10) = 0.285, p = 0.781, d = 0.118).