Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Visual Dominance Effect upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.

Chin Med J (Engl) · 2018 · PMC6085859 · PMID 30082523

3
hedged sentences
0.0540
closest p · 1.1× alpha
0.0540
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantP = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The main effect of task order was marginally significant ( F (1,32) = 4.01, P = 0.054, η 2 = 0.11), indicating that response reversals tended to be higher in the Auditory-Visual (5%) than the Visual-Auditory (3%) condition.

also in 26,082 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported
In addition, accuracy data at the long SOA of Experiment 1 showed a trend of RT-accuracy tradeoff in the Auditory-Visual condition: although the first auditory responses were slower than the second visual responses, accuracy was higher in the former than in the latter case [Figure 3a and 3b ].

also in 53,322 other papers

More importantly, all the interactions between experiment and gender did not reach statistical significance, indicating that the gender effect was matched between the two experiments.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.