For the TA muscle, analysis of mean CSA, MFD and eCSA showed a clear trend for greater increases in the SpillOver stimulated group than in the UNL stimulated group, but didnʹt reach statistical significance (p CSA = 0.455, p MFD = 0.630, p eCSA = 0.684).
← all excerpts
SpillOver stimulation: A novel hypertrophy model using co-contraction of the plantar-flexors to load the tibial anterior muscle in rats.
2
—
—
The sentences
The histological differences between the UNL and the SpillOver trained group showed a clear trend towards greater cellular hypertrophy using SpillOver stimulation but unlike the data for muscle wet mass did not reach statistical significance for any of the observed parameters.