only marginally significantp = 0.056
(3) Regression analysis to test the effect of visuospatial WM on error rate learning slope while controlling for math anxiety (path b) was only marginally significant, R 2 = 0.23, F (2,22) = 3.30, p = 0.056 (cf.
(3) Regression analysis to test the effect of visuospatial WM on error rate learning slope while controlling for math anxiety (path b) was only marginally significant, R 2 = 0.23, F (2,22) = 3.30, p = 0.056 (cf.
However, visuospatial WM was a nearly significant predictor of error rate learning slope when we added math anxiety to the model.