Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Efficacy and safety of standard and anti-reflux self-expanding metal stent: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

World J Gastrointest Endosc · 2019 · PMC6475701 · PMID 31040888

3
hedged sentences
0.0900
closest p · 1.8× alpha
0.0900
boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendP = 0.09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Compared to the standard stent, the anti-reflux stent showed a trend towards reduction in the dysphagia score without reaching a statistical significance [Standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.33 (-0.71, 0.05); P = 0.09, I 2 : 37%].

also in 53,322 other papers

Although more studies showed increased risk of bleeding, stent occlusion, and stent migration with SS; pooled data did not reach statistical significance[ 6 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 15 ].

also in 111,027 other papers

a favorable trendno p-value reported
Even though a favorable trend was seen towards ARS[ 11 , 12 , 15 ] in improving gastroesophageal reflux and dysphagia score, pooled statistical analysis did not show significant difference between those two stents.

also in 1,335 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.