The interaction between condition and adherence showed a trend of statistical significance, F (1,12) = 3.65, p = 0.080, which means that visual imagery (QMI) could be a moderator of the effect of the condition on adherence, accounting for 13.98% of the variance.
Analyses showed that adherence was significantly different between conditions when the cutaneous and visual (only a trend) imagery abilities were introduced as moderators (although the interaction was marginally significant in the case of the visual imagery ability).
Nevertheless, the difference between conditions at 2 weeks did not reach statistical significance, and the results derived from this subscale –as well as the mindful relaxation subscales– should be viewed with caution because the internal consistencies of these subscales were not adequate.