(2010) [ 67 ] was suspected to be a high outlier ( Figure 7 ), but failed to reach statistical significance ( p = 0.052), hence it was retained. 3.3.3.
← all excerpts
Dietary Glycemic Index and Load and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analyses of Prospective Cohort Studies.
2
0.0520
0.1100
The sentences
This difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.11, n = 10 studies).