approached significancep = 0.06
Second, ELA-K entered the light side with a shorter latency than both ELA ( t (34.5) = 2.64, p = 0.01) and approached significance compared to controls ( t (44.4) = 1.96, p = 0.06).
Second, ELA-K entered the light side with a shorter latency than both ELA ( t (34.5) = 2.64, p = 0.01) and approached significance compared to controls ( t (44.4) = 1.96, p = 0.06).
However, possibly due to high levels of variability in locomotion in LBN dams, this difference did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 2C ; F (1,17.0) = 2.76, p = 0.12).