a significant trendp = 0.07
However, during the crossover intervention, the differences (t6–t4) were not statistically significant, although we found a significant trend (FDR p = 0.07) ( Figure 5 ). 4.
However, during the crossover intervention, the differences (t6–t4) were not statistically significant, although we found a significant trend (FDR p = 0.07) ( Figure 5 ). 4.
This is consistent in both intervention periods, although in the case of gastrointestinal microbiome, the results only showed a trend in the second intervention, probably because of the dropout number we had, which is usual in large clinical intervention studies. 5.