clearly significantp = 0.018
Differences were clearly significant between groups GBOPT and GCC ( p = 0.018, Chi 2 test) but not between groups GS and GCC ( p = 0.215, Chi 2 test), or between groups GS and GBOPT ( p = 0.260, Chi 2 test).
Differences were clearly significant between groups GBOPT and GCC ( p = 0.018, Chi 2 test) but not between groups GS and GCC ( p = 0.215, Chi 2 test), or between groups GS and GBOPT ( p = 0.260, Chi 2 test).
Differences in BOP rates were situated on the threshold of significance ( p = 0.059).
Analyzing these results in relation to implant position (maxilla/mandible), differences were clear between the two types of cemented prostheses (groups GBOPT and GCC) ( p = 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis test); although differences did not reach statistical significance between the other groups, group GS and group GCC ( p = 0.299, Kruskal–Wallis test), or between group GS and group GBOPT ( p = 0.051, Kruskal–Wallis test).