Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Oral Free Paper Sessions.

Virchows Arch · 2016 · PMC7103182 · PMID 27553392

5
hedged sentences
0.0447
closest p · 0.9× alpha
0.0565
boldest claim

The sentences

not quite statistically significantp = 0.0447actually significant
Multivariate analysis showed patients’ age, positive endocervical and overall excision margins and worse definitive histological diagnosis (high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive carcinoma) to be statistically significant (p < 0.001) in predicting higher recurrence/persistence rate, whereas positive ectocervical excision margin was not quite statistically significant (p = 0.0447) and cone depth was not statistically significant at all (p = 0.181).

also in 341 other papers

almost significantp = 0.0565so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
This differences are almost significant (p = 0.0565).

also in 1,858 other papers

In bi-variate Cox regression analysis, CR/IDC (HR 3.3; 95 % CI 1.4–8.0; P = .008) was an independent parameter for disease-specific death, while %GG4 (HR 1.5; 95 % CI 1.0–2.4; P = .06) did not reach statistical significance.

also in 111,027 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported
Non-significant differences were found between the two subgroups with respect to 6-year mortality and major aorta related events, although the mixed group showed a trend to a poorer prognosis.

also in 53,322 other papers

an increasing trendno p-value reported
of Pathology, Bucharest, Romania Objective: Endometrial carcinoma is the 4th most common malignancy of the female reproductive system in Romania which is currently recording an increasing trend worldwide as well as in our country.

also in 63,971 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.