Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Assessing the need for pioglitazone in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of its risks and benefits from prospective trials.

Sci Rep · 2020 · PMC7519682 · PMID 32978507

4
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

4 a) In addition, there was 12% reduced odds of developing stroke, which did not reach statistical significance (95% CI 0.59–1.03).

also in 111,027 other papers

may not be significantno p-value reported
A quick perusal of these numbers is self-explanatory; although the risk of fractures may not be significant in clinical terms, the risk of HF is a huge concern despite a definite benefit noted in patients treated with Pio on MACE.

also in 2,774 other papers

Conclusion The use of Pio resulted in significant reduction in MACE, while a reduction in stroke which was seen against all comparators failed to reach statistical significance on subgroup analysis when compared to placebo.

also in 6,035 other papers

highly significantno p-value reported
The odds of anaemia associated with Pio use was also highly significant.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.