4 a) In addition, there was 12% reduced odds of developing stroke, which did not reach statistical significance (95% CI 0.59–1.03).
← all excerpts
Assessing the need for pioglitazone in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of its risks and benefits from prospective trials.
4
—
—
The sentences
A quick perusal of these numbers is self-explanatory; although the risk of fractures may not be significant in clinical terms, the risk of HF is a huge concern despite a definite benefit noted in patients treated with Pio on MACE.
Conclusion The use of Pio resulted in significant reduction in MACE, while a reduction in stroke which was seen against all comparators failed to reach statistical significance on subgroup analysis when compared to placebo.
The odds of anaemia associated with Pio use was also highly significant.