showed a trendp = .090
Of all behavioral measures, the LME analysis showed a trend‐wise significant interaction between time and group (interaction: F [1, 19] = 3.183, p = .090) for the TAS difficulty identify feeling (DIF) subscale.
Of all behavioral measures, the LME analysis showed a trend‐wise significant interaction between time and group (interaction: F [1, 19] = 3.183, p = .090) for the TAS difficulty identify feeling (DIF) subscale.
As for the trait‐rumination assessed with RRS, a paired t ‐test revealed that average scores of the RRS Reflection subscale were significantly increased in the cnf group ( p uncorrected <.05), while the RRS Brooding subscale and RRS Depressive rumination subscale were slightly decreased in this group (Table 1 ); however, any changes of these scores did not reach statistical significance after adjusting multiple comparisons. 3.8.