did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0586
showed a trendp = 0.0586
DAT−/− rats showed a 1.5-fold increase in the levels of ALDH1L1 (one-way ANOVA F (2, 14) = 11.79; p = 0.0010; Tukey’s multiple comparison test p = 0.0007 DAT−/− versus DAT+/+ controls), while DAT+/− rats showed a trend toward elevation that did not reach statistical significance (Tukey’s multiple comparison test p = 0.0586 DAT+/− versus DAT+/+ controls; Figure 4 A).