Barely Significant
← all excerpts

How Task Set and Task Switching Modulate Perceptual Processes: Is Recognition of Facial Emotion an Exception?

J Cogn · 2021 · PMC8344960 · PMID 34430795

3
hedged sentences
0.0900
closest p · 1.8× alpha
0.0900
boldest claim

The sentences

failed to reach significancep = 0.09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
In the 3 rd time-window, where the main effect of emotional expression failed to reach significance, F (1, 19) = 3.29, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.148, the interactions with switch/repeat, F (1, 19) = 1.53, p = 0.2, η p 2 = .076, and task, F (1, 19) = 0.82, p = 0.4, η p 2 = 0.041, were also non-significant.

also in 4,113 other papers

As with the previous analysis, the t statistic found no evidence that the mean delay of 4–10 ms was anywhere near statistical significance and Bayesian statistics found substantial support for the absence of a delay.

also in 222 other papers

approached significanceno p-value reported
None of the interactions of interest (those involving the factor n-1 facial expression) approached significance.

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.