In this dataset, all the 7-gene candidates exhibited a significant increase of mRNA expression in the metastasis group relative to localised tumours, with RUVBL1 exhibiting near statistical significance (U2AF2 P = 0.0106, RUVBL1 P = 0.051, HDGF P < 0.0001, FABP4 P = 0.0005, and STMN1 P = 0.032) (Fig. 4a–g ).
However, taking into account the age criterion, that difference was statistically significant only in the older group of patients ( p = 0.02), whereas in the younger group, it was near statistical significance ( p = 0.05).
After 1 year of follow-up, the OHS score in the combined treatment group was slightly higher than that in the HBO and CD groups, but the difference was only near statistical significance ( P = 0.05).
The effect of treatment on TRP concentration was near statistical significance ( P (2,39) = 0.0697), whereas the effects on the kind of bud and cultivar, were statistically significant ( P < 0.05).
Although no strongly significant differences were detected, borderline values were observed for Xmed in Conditions 1 and 5 ( p = 0.090) and reached near statistical significance in Condition 2 ( p = 0.050).
The results of the ANOVA show that the difference in the repetitions between females and males was near statistical significance (F(1,10) = 5.232, p = 0.05), though no significant difference in the RPE was observed (F(1,10) = 0.914, p = 0.367).
There were significant triglyceride results ( p = 0.0469) and near statistical significance for fasting insulin ( p = 0.0516) at 24 weeks.
The incidence of neoadjuvant radiotherapy was lower in the oMVR group with near statistical significance (58.3% vs 85.3%, P = 0.052).
All four compounds were positively correlated between day 5 wristbands and internal dose, with statistical significance observed for ethylparaben ( r s = 0.73, p = 0.012) and triclosan ( r s = 0.64, p = 0.047) and near statistical significance for methylparaben ( r s = 0.62, p = 0.054).
Latency was significantly higher in adult males compared to young males and of near statistical significance in adult males compared to adult females ( p = 0.056).
We found a correlation near statistical significance ( p = 0.056) between the mean values and the preoperative VAS scores ( r = −0.190).
The differences were near statistical significance (p = 0.056 and p = 0.051, respectively).
Additionally, data near statistical significance ( p = 0.056) suggest that high levels of TLR8 positively impact the survival of LUAD patients (Fig. 3 right panel).
The AM value was highest in the oldest group of students, with near statistical significance (p=0.057). 4.
However, it was only near statistical significance ( P = 0.057) [ Figure 3b ].
Leptin levels tended to be lower in HFD + CfPulp-E compared to HFD, near statistical significance ( p -value = 0.059), and were not modified by the other by-products ( Table 3 ).
66% for ENE‐negative), with near statistical significance ( p = 0.059).
The combined effect of the different trap models (sector 4) also showed a mosquito reduction with near statistical significance (25.6% reduction; p = 0.06).
For ROCF score, we observed a positive correlation with CSF irisin ( p = 0.001; r = 0.468), and a positive trend near statistical significance for serum irisin ( p = 0.060; r = 0.331) (Figure 2D,H ).
5), in which the median scores were near statistical significance ( p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ).
Multivariate analysis indicated the statistical significance of V2 CA 19-9 ( P =0.047) and near statistical significance of metastasis at diagnosis ( P =0.066) and V2 CTCs ( P =0.056) ( Table 2 ).
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL-2) also showed an increased concentration in the presence of ACF, near statistical significance ( p = 0.067).
The model that included the three factors was near statistical significance (F (5.32) = 2.32, p ~0.07)), with differences due to the ODCD factor; the interaction between the three factors was significant (F (5.32) = 4.85, p < 0.015).
The use of antibiotics appeared to be stable over time, but the use of systemic corticosteroids appeared to increase with near statistical significance (p = 0.07).
Previous EVAR returned an OR of 8.433 (95% CI, 0.804-88.402), with was near statistical significance ( P = .07).