Individualized response to semantic versus phonological aphasia therapies in stroke.

Brain Commun · 2021 · PMC8376685 · PMID 34423302

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.2280

closest p · 4.6× alpha

0.7680

boldest claim

The sentences

failed to reach statistical significanceP = 0.228not close (p > 0.1)

In terms of aphasia type, greatest numerical difference was observed for anomic aphasia (Sem versus Phon PMG: 0.28 versus 0.13), but this difference failed to reach statistical significance [paired- t (24) = 1.238, P = 0.228].

also in 6,035 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.768not close (p > 0.1)

Other factors did not reach statistical significance (treatment phase; β = 0.007, P = 0.768; treatment order, reference level: Sem first; β = −0.017, P = 0.467).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.