Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Neural correlates of visual stimulus encoding and verbal working memory differ between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing controls.

Eur J Neurosci · 2021 · PMC8457219 · PMID 34146363

4
hedged sentences
0.0640
closest p · 1.3× alpha
0.0800
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.064so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The three‐way interaction between CI/NH, left/right and auditory/visual was marginally significant ( F (1,26) = 3.75, p = 0.064, η 2 = 0.003).

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The left and right auditory ROIs showed larger inverse correlations to speech‐in‐noise perception ( ρ = −0.42 and −0.52, respectively) where the correlation with the right auditory ROI activation was trending but did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.07, uncorrected).

also in 111,027 other papers

close to significancep = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Statistically, task behaviour and effort and demand ratings in CI users were not significantly different from controls; however, the increase in difficulty for CI users over the NH group was close to significance ( t (26) = 1.80, p = 0.08, η 2 = 0.11).

also in 2,130 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported
In this study, CI users showed a trend of weaker alpha power compared with NH controls.

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.