marginally significantp = 0.064
The three‐way interaction between CI/NH, left/right and auditory/visual was marginally significant ( F (1,26) = 3.75, p = 0.064, η 2 = 0.003).
The three‐way interaction between CI/NH, left/right and auditory/visual was marginally significant ( F (1,26) = 3.75, p = 0.064, η 2 = 0.003).
The left and right auditory ROIs showed larger inverse correlations to speech‐in‐noise perception ( ρ = −0.42 and −0.52, respectively) where the correlation with the right auditory ROI activation was trending but did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.07, uncorrected).
Statistically, task behaviour and effort and demand ratings in CI users were not significantly different from controls; however, the increase in difficulty for CI users over the NH group was close to significance ( t (26) = 1.80, p = 0.08, η 2 = 0.11).
In this study, CI users showed a trend of weaker alpha power compared with NH controls.