A critical systematic review of the Neurotracker perceptual-cognitive training tool.

Psychon Bull Rev · 2021 · PMC8500884 · PMID 33821464

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0510

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.1980

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The results showed significant Neurotracker learning effects in all intervention groups and a marginally significant learning effect in the control group ( p = .051, d = 0.45).

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = .056so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The Neurotracker training group also improved in word span ( p = .005, d = .96), visual span ( p = .050, d = .60) and matrix span ( p = .015, d = .79) while for the active control group the improvemnets did not reach statistical significance: word span ( p = .056, d = .56), visual span ( p = .057, d = .58) and matrix span ( p = .180, d = .39).

also in 111,027 other papers

showed a trendp = .198not close (p > 0.1)

The passive control group showed a trend for improvements in visual span ( p = .198, d = .45) and matrix span ( p = .115, d = .49).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.