marginal significancep = 0.06
In the subgroup analysis, high-frequency WBV had marginal significance (SMD=0.59 points, 95% CI = –0.02 – 1.20, p = 0.06).
In the subgroup analysis, high-frequency WBV had marginal significance (SMD=0.59 points, 95% CI = –0.02 – 1.20, p = 0.06).
Meta-analysis showed a trend that WBV was superior to the control group, but did not reach statistical significance (SMD = 0.75 points, 95% CI = –0.18 – 1.68, p = 0.11).